Search found 21 matches
- Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:23 pm
- Forum: Part L2 - England & Wales
- Topic: District Heating CO2 Conversion Factor and primary Factor
- Replies: 5
- Views: 48965
Re: District Heating CO2 Conversion Factor and primary Facto
Hi, did you have any luck with soving this problem?
- Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:19 pm
- Forum: Part L2 - England & Wales
- Topic: Mechanical Ventilation Systems with Trim Cooling
- Replies: 8
- Views: 26010
Re: Mechanical Ventilation Systems with Trim Cooling
Hi,
I know this thread is ancient but I find this problem comes up regularly and trying to explain it to clients can be frustrating.
I wonder if selecting a "mixed mode" operation would suit? this would give a small cooling load and only during the Summer months but not excessive amounts so that ...
I know this thread is ancient but I find this problem comes up regularly and trying to explain it to clients can be frustrating.
I wonder if selecting a "mixed mode" operation would suit? this would give a small cooling load and only during the Summer months but not excessive amounts so that ...
- Wed Apr 24, 2013 12:58 pm
- Forum: Part L2 - England & Wales
- Topic: Criterion 2 U-value error
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9901
Re: Criterion 2 U-value error
Hi Zap/Phil,
Thanks for the advice, unfortunately, it's not actually a geometry error. There are no intersections or anything similar that are preventing any simulations from running. The problem is that when I try to assign a construction to a surface, the construction will not assign. I thought ...
Thanks for the advice, unfortunately, it's not actually a geometry error. There are no intersections or anything similar that are preventing any simulations from running. The problem is that when I try to assign a construction to a surface, the construction will not assign. I thought ...
- Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:06 pm
- Forum: ApacheSim
- Topic: Chillers Load calculation in IES?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 10702
Chillers Load calculation in IES?
Hi,
Brief query about the assessing the cooling load.
I've run a sim with a a mech. vent. system using a constant temp. profile of 19oC for the air supplied, rather than changing the system to "air-conditioned". That's all fine no problem.howver, when it comes to checking the loads, the systems ...
Brief query about the assessing the cooling load.
I've run a sim with a a mech. vent. system using a constant temp. profile of 19oC for the air supplied, rather than changing the system to "air-conditioned". That's all fine no problem.howver, when it comes to checking the loads, the systems ...
- Wed Apr 17, 2013 9:13 am
- Forum: Part L2 - England & Wales
- Topic: Criterion 2 U-value error
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9901
Criterion 2 U-value error
Hi all,
I have an error ocurring when trying to run a part l compliance check telling me that 0.02m^2 area of a floor construction is failing the maximum U-value. However, when I locate the room and the construction and try to assign it as something different (i.e. with a lower U-value), the ...
I have an error ocurring when trying to run a part l compliance check telling me that 0.02m^2 area of a floor construction is failing the maximum U-value. However, when I locate the room and the construction and try to assign it as something different (i.e. with a lower U-value), the ...
- Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:53 pm
- Forum: ModelIT
- Topic: Merging spaces vertically? or connect with holes?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9720
Re: Merging spaces vertically? or connect with holes?
Hi Phil,
Thanks for the information. I found that when running Part L calcs it makes a difference on Criterion 3 checks as it doesn't seem to consider the "connected" spaces as one whole space giving two different benchmarks and in my case, the upper area failed by 850% whilst the lower area ...
Thanks for the information. I found that when running Part L calcs it makes a difference on Criterion 3 checks as it doesn't seem to consider the "connected" spaces as one whole space giving two different benchmarks and in my case, the upper area failed by 850% whilst the lower area ...
- Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:26 pm
- Forum: ModelIT
- Topic: Merging spaces vertically? or connect with holes?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9720
Re: Merging spaces vertically? or connect with holes?
Hi Phil,
Sorry, I was just reading the post back and when I say join "with a hole", I mean joining them using the "connect spaces" tool, "remove partitions", and then pressing "Connect".
Will that give different results when running simulations than if choose "merge"?
Cheers,
C
Sorry, I was just reading the post back and when I say join "with a hole", I mean joining them using the "connect spaces" tool, "remove partitions", and then pressing "Connect".
Will that give different results when running simulations than if choose "merge"?
Cheers,
C
- Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:34 pm
- Forum: ModelIT
- Topic: Merging spaces vertically? or connect with holes?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9720
Re: Merging spaces vertically? or connect with holes?
Thanks for that Phil. Much appreciated.
- Thu Mar 14, 2013 9:09 am
- Forum: ModelIT
- Topic: Merging spaces vertically? or connect with holes?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9720
Merging spaces vertically? or connect with holes?
Hi,
Quick query about merging spaces to make them a double storey height.
Sometimes when two spaces stacked vertically are "merged", all sorts of intersection errors occur. If they are joined with a hole there are no errors. Is there any difference in how the building will perform when these two ...
Quick query about merging spaces to make them a double storey height.
Sometimes when two spaces stacked vertically are "merged", all sorts of intersection errors occur. If they are joined with a hole there are no errors. Is there any difference in how the building will perform when these two ...
- Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:59 pm
- Forum: ApacheSim
- Topic: Radiant heat fraction for Under floor heating
- Replies: 6
- Views: 13839
Re: Radiant heat fraction for Under floor heating
Fantastic Phil, just what I needed. I was almost certain I could recall my Uni lecturer telling me to put in 0.5 for underfloor heating, obviously I should trust my memeory a bit more
Thanks for that,
Colin
Thanks for that,
Colin