Best way to model 1 floor only for loads

VE-Pro module for 3D geometry creation, data assignment and import functions.
Post Reply
bootsam
VE Professor
VE Professor
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:15 pm

Best way to model 1 floor only for loads

Post by bootsam »

If i have a multi story building and i only need the loads for one intermediate floor. How is it best to model the ceiling and floor? Should i create a dummy space above and below, ie another floor. Or is there an easy way to set temps across the floors and ceilings.

Ta.
JohnLloyd
VE Professor
VE Professor
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:51 am

Re: Best way to model 1 floor only for loads

Post by JohnLloyd »

Draw a dummy floor above and below and then set them to be of type 'Adjacent Building'. The intermediate floor and ceiling will then be treated as adiabatic (i.e. no heat transfer).
bootsam
VE Professor
VE Professor
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:15 pm

Re: Best way to model 1 floor only for loads

Post by bootsam »

Cant I just use the 'edit multiple adjacancies' to put a temp on the ceilings and floors? Gotta be easier or is there something wrong with this way.
JohnLloyd
VE Professor
VE Professor
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:51 am

Re: Best way to model 1 floor only for loads

Post by JohnLloyd »

You can, and it will probably give you similar answers, but that method will result in both the floor and ceiling of your single floor being unshaded.

This is probably not a huge issue but I think it will make the thermal mass within those constructions act differently due to the additional flux hitting their outside surfaces.

That would only be an issue in a dynamic simulation and shouldn't impact any steady state calcs.
bootsam
VE Professor
VE Professor
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:15 pm

Re: Best way to model 1 floor only for loads

Post by bootsam »

Thanks John. Its only a steady state calc i am after. But I just needed confirmation that i can use both methods. Generally i dummy a floor but wondered whether i could use the adjancies instead.
Post Reply