General Lighting Confusion

Part L2 of the Building Regulations (2006 edition).
Post Reply
M_H
VE Beginner
VE Beginner
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 3:32 pm

General Lighting Confusion

Post by M_H »

Hi,

I have a warehouse project. At planning stage we did a preliminary model to test Part L compliance. At concept stage we did not have lighting design so we made assumptions and used inference method to input warehouse lighting at 60ll/W (within software equates to 100,301W general lighting load). BER-7.90 / TER-8.80

Following this the contractor was appointed and they have undertaken actual lighting design calculation. This calculation indicates that warehouse lighting load is likely to be 43,628W. We have now used wattage method (not inference method) and inputted 43,628W into our compliance calculation and we were expecting the BER figure to improve however i noticed the BER has gone worse. BER-10.50 / TER-8.80.

Can anyone please advise on this?

Image
Image
User avatar
Complex Potential
VE Expert
VE Expert
Posts: 467
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:57 am
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: General Lighting Confusion

Post by Complex Potential »

Without seeing the models it is quite difficult to say but my guess is that you may have overlooked something on the inputs.

When using the inference method the lux level is used to determine the overall Wattage but when inputting directly in Watts the lux level is essentially overridden.

As an aside, you should avoid using the direct Wattage input and instead use the Lux input method. It is more in line with the NCM modelling Guide.
M_H
VE Beginner
VE Beginner
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 3:32 pm

Re: General Lighting Confusion

Post by M_H »

OK, thanks a bunch
Post Reply