Local Extract SFP not reported correctly BRUKL 2013

[jerry]

This still seems to be a problem, even though I have been told by IES support that it has been fixed.
For example, I am still getting SFP values reported in column B for rooms that have a centralised MHVR system with the SFP defined at zone level.
Or is it just that the BRUKL form doesn't have a column for reporting centralised MVHR SFP values? None of the options A-I seem to cover this. According to table 35 of the NDBSCG, the limiting value for such systems is 1.6 and the only column on the BRUKL that has 1.6 as the limiting value is E (Local MVHR system serving a single area) - ie not a centralised system.
I'm confused, and am having to hand over BRUKL sheets to the client with red data values on them, not ideal.

Jerry

[VirtualEngineer]

Hi all

I have an issue with local mechanical ventilation reporting on the 2013 brukl in which MVHR (Mitsi Elec Lossnay) identical systems are reported in column B for "Zonal Supply system where fan is remote from zone" and also column D for "Zonal supply and extract ventilation units serving a single room or zone with heating and heat recovery"

The systems have been entered in exactly the same way, selecting "Zonal supply system with remote fan (eg ceiling void or roof mounted unit)" in the Aux energy tab in Apache Systems.

A couple of questions, is this the selection everyone uses for MVHR?

Does anyone have this issue with MVHR systems being reported with some in column B and others in D?

Thanks

VEng