Vertical Position of the Building

Fast, accurate dynamic thermal simulation for energy/carbon modelling and much more...
Post Reply
RossThompson87
VE Professor
VE Professor
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 8:56 am

Vertical Position of the Building

Post by RossThompson87 »

Hi,

I tend to use Google SketchUp for building my geometry. I often find it preferable to use the Architect's datum (generally sea level) as my vertical origin.

This makes checking floor levels etc. very easy.

However when these models are imported into IES, the building may sit say 70m above the ground plane. To be on the safe side I always move it down again.

Is this really necessary? Does the height of a zone above the origin effect wind speed etc?

Ross
User avatar
PCully
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1465
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:52 am

Re: Vertical Position of the Building

Post by PCully »

I think for completeness and to keep yourself right you should look to position your model treating Z=0 as the ground plane but really it will have no impact on the performance of your project, z-0 is not "ground level", it's just a position in space.

Phil
IES Worldwide Technical Support
JohnLloyd
VE Professor
VE Professor
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:51 am

Re: Vertical Position of the Building

Post by JohnLloyd »

I think it'll only have an impact if you've got basement levels.

From memory, Suncast will treat any surface which site below IES's zero plane as being completely shaded. Therefore, unless you manually draw in a large ground floor level your basement walls will receive solar energy.

I suppose it could also impact daylight calcs (and Radiance linked lighting dimming calcs) because reflections from the ground plane will not be correctly calculated??

Probably best to continue moving the building down to Z=0 to be sure.
Post Reply