VRF Efficiencies

Part L2 of the Building Regulations (2006 edition).
Post Reply
ColinR
VE Beginner
VE Beginner
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 8:36 am

VRF Efficiencies

Post by ColinR »

Hi All,

Just wondering what people are using for VRF efficiencies these days for Part L compliance?

I've been seeing some rather high figures quoted and am a bit nervous about using them (4.24 cooling 3.82 heating) What do you think is a reasonable figure with todays current technology?

Cheers,

C
User avatar
Complex Potential
VE Expert
VE Expert
Posts: 467
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:57 am
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: VRF Efficiencies

Post by Complex Potential »

For heating I tend to get suspicious if it's higher than 3 for an annual efficiency in most UK locations. It's an area of the regulations which needs tightening up IMHO since the actual efficiency is going to be very bespoke in each case and so quoting some figure from a manufacturers spec sheet feels wrong.

Daikin have made strides in dealing with this using their plug-in for IES which bespokely calculates the annual efficiencies. It's free but it only works with Daikin products at the monent.
ColinR
VE Beginner
VE Beginner
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 8:36 am

Re: VRF Efficiencies

Post by ColinR »

Thanks for that response.

I've heard some dubious figures being quoted and i'm just not confident in using them. sure it makes for great results in compliance but are they realistic, I'm not sure.

I've had a look at the Daikin plug-in, pretty useful if you're definitely using Daikin units!
bootsam
VE Professor
VE Professor
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:15 pm

Re: VRF Efficiencies

Post by bootsam »

I use 3 to 3.5. From experience i note that this is reasonable to assume. However as a previous poster stated 3 is a good start. If its okay at 3 then i leave it. I only use 3.5 when i need to tweak. I would advise against going above this unless detailed design has been carried out and you know the actual figure.
Post Reply