Re: SBEM Calculations - Incorrect U-Values
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:19 am
Hi,
There was an issue a while back in version 5.8 of <VE> where VE-SBEM would treat surfaces as Personnel Doors when a hole connected two rooms that did not cover all of the internal partition between the rooms, the leftover internal adjacency would be treated as Personnel Doors in the U-value checks. This was an error that BRE corrected some time ago so if you are using <VE> 5.9 or 6 then this should not be an issue.
Can you confirm if this scenario may apply and what version of <VE> you are using please?
Also, just use the CDB to double check the Constructions you think are in use are in use for all doors.
If you still don't find a solution then I will contact you to get the model and check for myself, everything looks ok in the simple tests I have performed so far.
Phil
There was an issue a while back in version 5.8 of <VE> where VE-SBEM would treat surfaces as Personnel Doors when a hole connected two rooms that did not cover all of the internal partition between the rooms, the leftover internal adjacency would be treated as Personnel Doors in the U-value checks. This was an error that BRE corrected some time ago so if you are using <VE> 5.9 or 6 then this should not be an issue.
Can you confirm if this scenario may apply and what version of <VE> you are using please?
Also, just use the CDB to double check the Constructions you think are in use are in use for all doors.
If you still don't find a solution then I will contact you to get the model and check for myself, everything looks ok in the simple tests I have performed so far.
Phil