Compared lighting analysis
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 4:56 pm
I am using IES for an academic research project and I am trying to assess different facade options for a typical office room.
I have come across a useful software developed by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory called ComFen (based on energyplus engine) which does exactly that http://windows.lbl.gov/software/comfen/4/Overview.png.
Now, because IES VE is far more versatile and powerful software package the number of variables and controls to set in order to achieve a similar comparative analyses are more time consuming.
However, I am particularly interested in assessing different facade options with regards to daylight levels and energy saving as a result of dimming.
My main doubts are the following:
- there can be inconsistency between the lighting levels within the thermal template (assuming, for a UK scenario, the NCM ref values for office buildings) where under internal gain: max ill 400lux and lightPro template where ill level= 500lux. Which one is to take into consideration? Will Radiance take that into consideration of sensors even if luminaires are not modelled?
- is there any quick way to obtain parametric values for energy consumption for lighting for each dummy room (each with a different shading system)? The following slides show results I obtained by running comparative analyses on passive performance for different shading systems for dummy rooms (sized as a "slice" of the building I am studying)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/8cbrq0um1p5oa4x/Slide1.JPG
https://www.dropbox.com/s/aqezc0bpdn6t0c5/Slide2.JPG
https://www.dropbox.com/s/kkv52f765p9nnle/Slide3.JPG
https://www.dropbox.com/s/wc9rlgboyuidi8z/Slide4.JPG
https://www.dropbox.com/s/gfdefiizvlgq3ft/Slide5.JPG
Thanks,
Andrea
I have come across a useful software developed by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory called ComFen (based on energyplus engine) which does exactly that http://windows.lbl.gov/software/comfen/4/Overview.png.
Now, because IES VE is far more versatile and powerful software package the number of variables and controls to set in order to achieve a similar comparative analyses are more time consuming.
However, I am particularly interested in assessing different facade options with regards to daylight levels and energy saving as a result of dimming.
My main doubts are the following:
- there can be inconsistency between the lighting levels within the thermal template (assuming, for a UK scenario, the NCM ref values for office buildings) where under internal gain: max ill 400lux and lightPro template where ill level= 500lux. Which one is to take into consideration? Will Radiance take that into consideration of sensors even if luminaires are not modelled?
- is there any quick way to obtain parametric values for energy consumption for lighting for each dummy room (each with a different shading system)? The following slides show results I obtained by running comparative analyses on passive performance for different shading systems for dummy rooms (sized as a "slice" of the building I am studying)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/8cbrq0um1p5oa4x/Slide1.JPG
https://www.dropbox.com/s/aqezc0bpdn6t0c5/Slide2.JPG
https://www.dropbox.com/s/kkv52f765p9nnle/Slide3.JPG
https://www.dropbox.com/s/wc9rlgboyuidi8z/Slide4.JPG
https://www.dropbox.com/s/gfdefiizvlgq3ft/Slide5.JPG
Thanks,
Andrea