ASHRAE PRM - Low HVAC Loads
Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 9:29 pm
I’m working on an early phase LEED/ASHRAE PRM model. I work in a mechanical engineering firm, and have 10 yrs experience as an energy modeler, and 5+ years experience as an HVAC designer.
The building loads (both baseline and proposed) calculated by the PRM simulation are too low to be believed.
My, inputs, and the PRM report indicate that the internal loads inputs seem reasonable:
Lighting = 0.94 w/sf
Receptacle = 0.45 w/sf
People = 275 sf/ppl
The load reports indicate the autosized design flow is 0.3 cfm/sf - 0.4 cfm/sf and the cooling load is between 13 and 15 btuh/sf (800 - 920 sf/ton).
These HVAC loads are simply too low. No practicing mechanical engineer is ever going to size his units this low. I do not believe it’s appropriate to size the ASHRAE Baseline Units this low. My (and industry) expectation is about 0.75 – 1.0 cfm/sf and ~400 sf/ton.
In fact, since the min turndown flow for the Baseline VAV system is 0.40 cfm/sf, it is effectively a constant volume unit.
Why are the calculated HVAC loads so low when my inputs seem appropriate?
The building loads (both baseline and proposed) calculated by the PRM simulation are too low to be believed.
My, inputs, and the PRM report indicate that the internal loads inputs seem reasonable:
Lighting = 0.94 w/sf
Receptacle = 0.45 w/sf
People = 275 sf/ppl
The load reports indicate the autosized design flow is 0.3 cfm/sf - 0.4 cfm/sf and the cooling load is between 13 and 15 btuh/sf (800 - 920 sf/ton).
These HVAC loads are simply too low. No practicing mechanical engineer is ever going to size his units this low. I do not believe it’s appropriate to size the ASHRAE Baseline Units this low. My (and industry) expectation is about 0.75 – 1.0 cfm/sf and ~400 sf/ton.
In fact, since the min turndown flow for the Baseline VAV system is 0.40 cfm/sf, it is effectively a constant volume unit.
Why are the calculated HVAC loads so low when my inputs seem appropriate?