DHW Delivery Efficiency
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:37 pm
Should both DHW delivery efficiency and circulation losses be included?
IES Guidance on the knowledge base states:
'If secondary circulation and/or storage losses are used, then the DHW delivery efficiency should be set to 1. Otherwise the losses are accounted twice.'
https://www.iesve.com/support/knowledge ... e/faq/4326
The SBEM Technical Manual P93 states:
'Note: If the hot water is provided by the HVAC system’s heat generator, rather than by an independent generator, the efficiency of the heat generator is reduced by 5% for the water heating calculation in order to take account of the reduction in the efficiency at part load (since the generator has been sized to accommodate both the space and water heating loads).'
Based on the SBEM technical manual wording the DHW delivery efficiency in IES is representing the 5% reduction in heat generator efficiency. My understanding is therefore that both DHW delivery efficiency and circulation losses should be included.
An alternative thought was that IES was applying the %5 reduction if generator type is set as 'same as space heating', but this doesn't appear to be the case.
Would appreciate other peoples thoughts and interpretations of this.
thanks
IES Guidance on the knowledge base states:
'If secondary circulation and/or storage losses are used, then the DHW delivery efficiency should be set to 1. Otherwise the losses are accounted twice.'
https://www.iesve.com/support/knowledge ... e/faq/4326
The SBEM Technical Manual P93 states:
'Note: If the hot water is provided by the HVAC system’s heat generator, rather than by an independent generator, the efficiency of the heat generator is reduced by 5% for the water heating calculation in order to take account of the reduction in the efficiency at part load (since the generator has been sized to accommodate both the space and water heating loads).'
Based on the SBEM technical manual wording the DHW delivery efficiency in IES is representing the 5% reduction in heat generator efficiency. My understanding is therefore that both DHW delivery efficiency and circulation losses should be included.
An alternative thought was that IES was applying the %5 reduction if generator type is set as 'same as space heating', but this doesn't appear to be the case.
Would appreciate other peoples thoughts and interpretations of this.
thanks